Bristol Caravel 22 vs D&M 22
How do the Bristol Caravel 22 and D&M 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bristol Caravel 22 | Bristol Caravel 22 | D&M 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.4 ft2.57 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,850 lb1,293 kg | 2,775 lb1,259 kg |
| Ballast | 1,150 lb522 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 254 ft²23.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.32 | 20.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 188 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Bristol Caravel 22 vs D&M 22: the short version
- The Bristol Caravel 22 and D&M 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the D&M 22 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bristol Caravel 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bristol Caravel 22 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.