Bristol Caravel 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22
How do the Bristol Caravel 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bristol Caravel 22 | Bristol Caravel 22 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,850 lb1,293 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 1,150 lb522 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.32 | 13.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 366 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 33.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.1 |
Bristol Caravel 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22: the short version
- The Bristol Caravel 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 160% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bristol Caravel 22 carries the more powerful rig (16.3 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.