Bristol Caravel 22 vs Hurley 22
How do the Bristol Caravel 22 and Hurley 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bristol Caravel 22 | Bristol Caravel 22 | Hurley 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 17.0 ft5.18 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.3 ft2.22 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 2,850 lb1,293 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 1,150 lb522 kg | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 296 ft²27.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.32 | 18.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 361 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 23.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.5 |
| Average used price | — | €2,900 |
Bristol Caravel 22 vs Hurley 22: the short version
- The Bristol Caravel 22 and Hurley 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Hurley 22 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hurley 22 carries the more powerful rig (18.9 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 22 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 2.19).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.