Bristol Caravel 22 vs Johnson 23
How do the Bristol Caravel 22 and Johnson 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bristol Caravel 22 | Bristol Caravel 22 | Johnson 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 21.9 ft6.68 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 2,850 lb1,293 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,150 lb522 kg | 1,411 lb640 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 291 ft²27.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.32 | 23.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 13.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Bristol Caravel 22 vs Johnson 23: the short version
- The Bristol Caravel 22 and Johnson 23 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 21.9 ft6.68 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Johnson 23 carries the more powerful rig (23.1 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bristol Caravel 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bristol Caravel 22 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.