Bristol Caravel 22 vs Newport 20
How do the Bristol Caravel 22 and Newport 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bristol Caravel 22 
Newport 20 | Bristol Caravel 22 | Newport 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 3.3 ft1.01 m |
| Displacement | 2,850 lb1,293 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Ballast | 1,150 lb522 kg | 990 lb449 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 197 ft²18.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.32 | 17.11 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 13.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.7 |
Bristol Caravel 22 vs Newport 20: the short version
- The Bristol Caravel 22 and Newport 20 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Bristol Caravel 22 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Newport 20 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bristol Caravel 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bristol Caravel 22 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.