Bristol Caravel 22 vs Sonata 6.7
How do the Bristol Caravel 22 and Sonata 6.7 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Bristol Caravel 22 | Bristol Caravel 22 | Sonata 6.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 2,850 lb1,293 kg | 2,544 lb1,154 kg |
| Ballast | 1,150 lb522 kg | 952 lb432 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 224 ft²20.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.32 | 19.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 157 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 11.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Bristol Caravel 22 vs Sonata 6.7: the short version
- The Bristol Caravel 22 and Sonata 6.7 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Bristol Caravel 22 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sonata 6.7 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bristol Caravel 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bristol Caravel 22 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.