Buccaneer 200 vs San Juan 21
How do the Buccaneer 200 and San Juan 21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 200 
San Juan 21 | Buccaneer 200 | San Juan 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.4 ft6.22 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Waterline length | 17.3 ft5.28 m | 17.5 ft5.33 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 17.3 ft5.28 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Ballast | 750 lb340 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 189 ft²17.6 m² | 193 ft²17.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.44 | 26.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 104 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.1 | 7.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.50 | 2.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Buccaneer 200 vs San Juan 21: the short version
- The Buccaneer 200 and San Juan 21 are close in length (20.4 ft6.22 m vs 20.5 ft6.25 m ).
- The Buccaneer 200 is heavier, displacing about 68% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the San Juan 21 carries the more powerful rig (26.6 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 200 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 200 rates better for offshore work (2.50 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.