Buccaneer 210 vs Clipper 21
How do the Buccaneer 210 and Clipper 21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 210 | Buccaneer 210 | Clipper 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 20.9 ft6.36 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.59 m | 16.7 ft5.08 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,800 lb816 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 410 lb186 kg |
| Sail area | 198 ft²18.4 m² | 192 ft²17.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.23 | 20.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 173 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.2 | 11.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.5 |
Buccaneer 210 vs Clipper 21: the short version
- The Buccaneer 210 and Clipper 21 are close in length (20.8 ft6.35 m vs 20.9 ft6.36 m ).
- The Buccaneer 210 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Clipper 21 carries the more powerful rig (20.8 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 210 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 210 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.