Buccaneer 210 vs Impulse 21
How do the Buccaneer 210 and Impulse 21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 210 | Buccaneer 210 | Impulse 21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.8 ft6.35 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.59 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 198 ft²18.4 m² | 207 ft²19.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.23 | 27.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 92 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.2 | 6.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.8 |
Buccaneer 210 vs Impulse 21: the short version
- The Buccaneer 210 and Impulse 21 are close in length (20.8 ft6.35 m vs 21.0 ft6.40 m ).
- The Buccaneer 210 is heavier, displacing about 131% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Impulse 21 carries the more powerful rig (27.8 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 210 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 210 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.93).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.