Buccaneer 240 vs Ranger 23
How do the Buccaneer 240 and Ranger 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 240 | Buccaneer 240 | Ranger 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.7 ft7.21 m | 23.7 ft7.21 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 3,400 lb1,542 kg |
| Ballast | 1,250 lb567 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 220 ft²20.4 m² | 244 ft²22.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.97 | 17.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 213 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.2 | 15.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.0 |
Buccaneer 240 vs Ranger 23: the short version
- The Buccaneer 240 and Ranger 23 are close in length (23.7 ft7.21 m vs 23.7 ft7.21 m ).
- The Buccaneer 240 is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Ranger 23 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 14.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 240 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 240 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.