Buccaneer vs Hampton One-Design
How do the Buccaneer and Hampton One-Design compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 
Hampton One-Design | Buccaneer | Hampton One-Design | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.0 ft5.49 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Waterline length | 16.7 ft5.08 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 5.8 ft1.76 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 500 lb227 kg | 755 lb342 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 175 ft²16.3 m² | 175 ft²16.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 44.45 | 33.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 48 | 123 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.2 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 3.02 | 2.54 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.0 |
Buccaneer vs Hampton One-Design: the short version
- The Buccaneer and Hampton One-Design are close in length (18.0 ft5.49 m vs 18.0 ft5.49 m ).
- The Hampton One-Design is heavier, displacing about 51% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Buccaneer carries the more powerful rig (44.4 vs 33.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hampton One-Design scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hampton One-Design rates better for offshore work (2.54 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.