Buccaneer vs Microsail
How do the Buccaneer and Microsail compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Buccaneer 
Microsail | Buccaneer | Microsail | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.0 ft5.49 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Waterline length | 16.7 ft5.08 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 500 lb227 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 507 lb230 kg |
| Sail area | 175 ft²16.3 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 44.45 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 48 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 4.2 | 7.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.02 | 2.93 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.5 | 5.4 |
Buccaneer vs Microsail: the short version
- The Buccaneer and Microsail are close in length (18.0 ft5.49 m vs 18.0 ft5.50 m ).
- The Microsail is heavier, displacing about 165% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Microsail scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Microsail rates better for offshore work (2.93 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.