C-Lark vs DC‐14 Phantom
How do the C-Lark and DC‐14 Phantom compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Lark 
DC‐14 Phantom | C-Lark | DC‐14 Phantom | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.7 ft1.74 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 2.2 ft0.66 m |
| Displacement | 295 lb134 kg | 350 lb159 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 133 ft²12.4 m² | 140 ft²13.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 48.02 | 45.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 48 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 3.2 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.43 | 3.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | — |
C-Lark vs DC‐14 Phantom: the short version
- The C-Lark and DC‐14 Phantom are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.2 ft4.32 m ).
- The DC‐14 Phantom is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C-Lark carries the more powerful rig (48.0 vs 45.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C-Lark rates better for offshore work (3.43 vs 3.79).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.