C-Lark vs Lido 14
How do the C-Lark and Lido 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Lark 
Lido 14 | C-Lark | Lido 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Beam | 5.7 ft1.74 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 295 lb134 kg | 310 lb141 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 133 ft²12.4 m² | 111 ft²10.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 48.02 | 38.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 48 | 53 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Capsize screening | 3.43 | 3.55 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.0 |
C-Lark vs Lido 14: the short version
- The C-Lark and Lido 14 are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.0 ft4.27 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C-Lark carries the more powerful rig (48.0 vs 38.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C-Lark scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C-Lark rates better for offshore work (3.43 vs 3.55).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.