C-Lark vs Phantom 14
How do the C-Lark and Phantom 14 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Lark 
Phantom 14 | C-Lark | Phantom 14 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 14.1 ft4.30 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.7 ft1.74 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 295 lb134 kg | 198 lb90 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 133 ft²12.4 m² | 107 ft²9.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 48.02 | 50.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 48 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 3.2 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.43 | 4.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | — |
C-Lark vs Phantom 14: the short version
- The C-Lark and Phantom 14 are close in length (14.0 ft4.27 m vs 14.1 ft4.30 m ).
- The C-Lark is heavier, displacing about 49% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom 14 carries the more powerful rig (50.4 vs 48.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C-Lark rates better for offshore work (3.43 vs 4.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.