C-Scow vs Chrysler 20
How do the C-Scow and Chrysler 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Scow | C-Scow | Chrysler 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 650 lb295 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 810 lb367 kg |
| Sail area | 216 ft²20.1 m² | 193 ft²17.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 46.06 | 18.26 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 168 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 13.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.23 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.7 |
C-Scow vs Chrysler 20: the short version
- The C-Scow and Chrysler 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Chrysler 20 is heavier, displacing about 238% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C-Scow carries the more powerful rig (46.1 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Chrysler 20 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 3.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.