C-Scow vs Conrad 20
How do the C-Scow and Conrad 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Scow | C-Scow | Conrad 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 17.9 ft5.45 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 650 lb295 kg | 1,874 lb850 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 772 lb350 kg |
| Sail area | 216 ft²20.1 m² | 180 ft²16.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 46.06 | 18.95 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 146 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 12.3 |
| Capsize screening | 3.23 | 2.19 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.7 |
| Average used price | — | €1,900 |
C-Scow vs Conrad 20: the short version
- The C-Scow and Conrad 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Conrad 20 is heavier, displacing about 188% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C-Scow carries the more powerful rig (46.1 vs 18.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Conrad 20 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 3.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.