C-Scow vs Cracksman 20
How do the C-Scow and Cracksman 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Scow 
Cracksman 20 | C-Scow | Cracksman 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | —— |
| Displacement | 650 lb295 kg | 1,151 lb522 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 216 ft²20.1 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 46.06 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | 125 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 6.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.23 | 3.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.4 |
C-Scow vs Cracksman 20: the short version
- The C-Scow and Cracksman 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Cracksman 20 is heavier, displacing about 77% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cracksman 20 rates better for offshore work (3.06 vs 3.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.