C-Scow vs Flying 15
How do the C-Scow and Flying 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Scow %20(cropped).jpg?width=960)
Flying 15 | C-Scow | Flying 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 650 lb295 kg | 725 lb329 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 372 lb169 kg |
| Sail area | 216 ft²20.1 m² | 142 ft²13.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 46.06 | 28.15 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 96 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 5.1 |
| Capsize screening | 3.23 | 3.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.2 |
C-Scow vs Flying 15: the short version
- The C-Scow and Flying 15 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Flying 15 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C-Scow carries the more powerful rig (46.1 vs 28.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Flying 15 rates better for offshore work (3.12 vs 3.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.