C-Scow vs Tornado
How do the C-Scow and Tornado compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C-Scow 
Tornado | C-Scow | Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 19.2 ft5.84 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 10.1 ft3.08 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 650 lb295 kg | 342 lb155 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 216 ft²20.1 m² | 236 ft²21.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 46.06 | 77.21 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 22 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 1.3 |
| Capsize screening | 3.23 | 5.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.9 |
C-Scow vs Tornado: the short version
- The C-Scow and Tornado are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The C-Scow is heavier, displacing about 90% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tornado carries the more powerful rig (77.2 vs 46.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the C-Scow rates better for offshore work (3.23 vs 5.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.