Cal 2-24 vs Cal 39 Mark II
How do the Cal 2-24 and Cal 39 Mark II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-24 | Cal 2-24 | Cal 39 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 32.1 ft9.78 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 1,400 lb635 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Sail area | 271 ft²25.2 m² | 719 ft²66.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.13 | 17.40 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 230 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 28.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 7.6 |
Cal 2-24 vs Cal 39 Mark II: the short version
- The Cal 39 Mark II is the larger boat at 39.0 ft11.89 m LOA versus 24.0 ft7.32 m for the Cal 2-24.
- The Cal 39 Mark II is heavier, displacing about 359% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 2-24 carries the more powerful rig (18.1 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 39 Mark II scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 39 Mark II rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.