Cal 2-24 vs Captiva 240
How do the Cal 2-24 and Captiva 240 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-24 | Cal 2-24 | Captiva 240 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 24.0 ft7.32 m |
| Waterline length | 19.2 ft5.84 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 3,700 lb1,678 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 1,400 lb635 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 271 ft²25.2 m² | 280 ft²26.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.13 | 24.99 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 2.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.0 |
Cal 2-24 vs Captiva 240: the short version
- The Cal 2-24 and Captiva 240 are close in length (24.0 ft7.32 m vs 24.0 ft7.32 m ).
- The Cal 2-24 is heavier, displacing about 54% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Captiva 240 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 18.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 2-24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 2-24 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.