Cal 2-25 vs C&C 25
How do the Cal 2-25 and C&C 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-25 | Cal 2-25 | C&C 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 25.2 ft7.68 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 4,500 lb2,041 kg | 4,189 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 315 ft²29.3 m² | 344 ft²32.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.49 | 21.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 189 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.2 | 16.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | — | €5,000 |
Cal 2-25 vs C&C 25: the short version
- The Cal 2-25 and C&C 25 are close in length (25.3 ft7.70 m vs 25.2 ft7.68 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.2 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 25 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.