Cal 2-25 vs Northern 25
How do the Cal 2-25 and Northern 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-25 
Northern 25 | Cal 2-25 | Northern 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 25.3 ft7.70 m |
| Waterline length | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 4,500 lb2,041 kg | 5,100 lb2,313 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 315 ft²29.3 m² | 304 ft²28.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.49 | 16.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 189 | 319 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.2 | 22.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 1.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 5.9 |
Cal 2-25 vs Northern 25: the short version
- The Cal 2-25 and Northern 25 are close in length (25.3 ft7.70 m vs 25.3 ft7.70 m ).
- The Northern 25 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 2-25 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Northern 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Northern 25 rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.