Cal 2-27 vs Cal 9.2
How do the Cal 2-27 and Cal 9.2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-27 
Cal 9.2 | Cal 2-27 | Cal 9.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.6 ft8.10 m | 30.0 ft9.13 m |
| Waterline length | 22.1 ft6.73 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 6,700 lb3,039 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 2,730 lb1,238 kg |
| Sail area | 375 ft²34.8 m² | 388 ft²36.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.88 | 16.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 278 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.8 | 18.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.8 |
Cal 2-27 vs Cal 9.2: the short version
- The Cal 9.2 is the larger boat at 30.0 ft9.13 m LOA versus 26.6 ft8.10 m for the Cal 2-27.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 9.2 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 16.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 2-27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 2-27 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.