Cal 2-27 vs Finn 26
How do the Cal 2-27 and Finn 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 2-27 
Finn 26 | Cal 2-27 | Finn 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.6 ft8.10 m | 26.5 ft8.07 m |
| Waterline length | 22.1 ft6.73 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 6,700 lb3,039 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 3,100 lb1,406 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 375 ft²34.8 m² | 409 ft²38.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.88 | 22.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 278 | 269 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.8 | 18.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.96 | 2.14 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €6,100 |
Cal 2-27 vs Finn 26: the short version
- The Cal 2-27 and Finn 26 are close in length (26.6 ft8.10 m vs 26.5 ft8.07 m ).
- The Cal 2-27 is heavier, displacing about 32% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Finn 26 carries the more powerful rig (22.2 vs 16.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 2-27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 2-27 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.14).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.