Cal 22 vs D&M 22
How do the Cal 22 and D&M 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 22 | Cal 22 | D&M 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.4 ft2.57 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 2,775 lb1,259 kg |
| Ballast | 775 lb352 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 254 ft²23.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.76 | 20.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | 188 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.5 | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Cal 22 vs D&M 22: the short version
- The Cal 22 and D&M 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The D&M 22 is heavier, displacing about 32% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 20.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The D&M 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the D&M 22 rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.