Cal 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22
How do the Cal 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 22 | Cal 22 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 775 lb352 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.76 | 13.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | 366 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.5 | 33.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.1 |
Cal 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22: the short version
- The Cal 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 252% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.