Cal 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket
How do the Cal 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 22 | Cal 22 | Laminex Pocket Rocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 775 lb352 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 258 ft²24.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.76 | 23.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | 108 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.5 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.2 |
Cal 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket: the short version
- The Cal 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Laminex Pocket Rocket is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Laminex Pocket Rocket carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 21.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 22 rates better for offshore work (2.42 vs 2.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.