Cal 22 vs Sonata 6.7
How do the Cal 22 and Sonata 6.7 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 22 | Cal 22 | Sonata 6.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Waterline length | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 19.4 ft5.90 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 2,544 lb1,154 kg |
| Ballast | 775 lb352 kg | 952 lb432 kg |
| Sail area | 223 ft²20.7 m² | 224 ft²20.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.76 | 19.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 126 | 157 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.5 | 11.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.42 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Cal 22 vs Sonata 6.7: the short version
- The Cal 22 and Sonata 6.7 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.70 m ).
- The Sonata 6.7 is heavier, displacing about 21% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Sonata 6.7 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sonata 6.7 rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.