Cal 28 vs Cal 9.2
How do the Cal 28 and Cal 9.2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 28 | Cal 28 | Cal 9.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 30.0 ft9.13 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 2,200 lb998 kg | 2,730 lb1,238 kg |
| Sail area | 352 ft²32.7 m² | 388 ft²36.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.06 | 16.96 |
| Displacement / Length | 235 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.6 | 18.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.98 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.8 |
Cal 28 vs Cal 9.2: the short version
- The Cal 9.2 is the larger boat at 30.0 ft9.13 m LOA versus 28.0 ft8.53 m for the Cal 28.
- The Cal 9.2 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 28 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 28 rates better for offshore work (1.98 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.