Cal 3-24 vs Ericson 25
How do the Cal 3-24 and Ericson 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 3-24 | Cal 3-24 | Ericson 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.7 ft7.52 m | 24.7 ft7.52 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 3.8 ft1.16 m |
| Displacement | 3,300 lb1,497 kg | 5,100 lb2,313 kg |
| Ballast | 1,175 lb533 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 261 ft²24.2 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.84 | 14.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 184 | 252 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.9 | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.1 |
Cal 3-24 vs Ericson 25: the short version
- The Cal 3-24 and Ericson 25 are close in length (24.7 ft7.52 m vs 24.7 ft7.52 m ).
- The Ericson 25 is heavier, displacing about 55% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 3-24 carries the more powerful rig (18.8 vs 14.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Ericson 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Ericson 25 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.