Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 34 Mark II
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Columbia 34 Mark II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise 
Columbia 34 Mark II | Cal 35 Cruise | Columbia 34 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 33.6 ft10.24 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 12,000 lb5,443 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 4,700 lb2,132 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 526 ft²48.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 16.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 262 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 29.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.0 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 34 Mark II: the short version
- The Cal 35 Cruise is the larger boat at 35.1 ft10.69 m LOA versus 33.6 ft10.24 m for the Columbia 34 Mark II.
- The Cal 35 Cruise is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 34 Mark II carries the more powerful rig (16.1 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 35 Cruise scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 34 Mark II rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.