Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 36
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Columbia 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise | Cal 35 Cruise | Columbia 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 12,000 lb5,443 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 556 ft²51.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 16.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 26.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.1 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 36: the short version
- The Columbia 36 is the larger boat at 35.8 ft10.90 m LOA versus 35.1 ft10.69 m for the Cal 35 Cruise.
- The Cal 35 Cruise is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 36 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 35 Cruise scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 35 Cruise rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.