Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 38
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Columbia 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise | Cal 35 Cruise | Columbia 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 38.9 ft11.86 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 25.8 ft7.85 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 10.7 ft3.25 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 5.8 ft1.75 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 14,000 lb6,350 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 6,400 lb2,903 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 650 ft²60.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 17.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 366 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 31.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.77 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 6.8 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 38: the short version
- The Columbia 38 is the larger boat at 38.9 ft11.86 m LOA versus 35.1 ft10.69 m for the Cal 35 Cruise.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 38 carries the more powerful rig (17.9 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 38 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.