Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 40
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Columbia 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise | Cal 35 Cruise | Columbia 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 39.5 ft12.04 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 18,900 lb8,573 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 8,400 lb3,810 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 647 ft²60.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 14.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 395 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 40.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.58 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.1 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia 40: the short version
- The Columbia 40 is the larger boat at 39.5 ft12.04 m LOA versus 35.1 ft10.69 m for the Cal 35 Cruise.
- The Columbia 40 is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 40 carries the more powerful rig (14.6 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 40 rates better for offshore work (1.58 vs 1.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.