Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia T-23
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Columbia T-23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise | Cal 35 Cruise | Columbia T-23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 22.6 ft6.88 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 1.1 ft0.33 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 810 lb367 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 20.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 128 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 10.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 6.0 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Columbia T-23: the short version
- The Cal 35 Cruise is the larger boat at 35.1 ft10.69 m LOA versus 22.6 ft6.88 m for the Columbia T-23.
- The Cal 35 Cruise is heavier, displacing about 552% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia T-23 carries the more powerful rig (20.0 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 35 Cruise scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 35 Cruise rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.