Cal 35 Cruise vs Com-Pac 25
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Com-Pac 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise | Cal 35 Cruise | Com-Pac 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 28.2 ft8.59 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 14.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 18.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 6.1 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Com-Pac 25: the short version
- The Cal 35 Cruise is the larger boat at 35.1 ft10.69 m LOA versus 28.2 ft8.59 m for the Com-Pac 25.
- The Cal 35 Cruise is heavier, displacing about 213% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac 25 carries the more powerful rig (14.9 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 35 Cruise scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 35 Cruise rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.