Cal 35 Cruise vs Express 35
How do the Cal 35 Cruise and Express 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 Cruise 
Express 35 | Cal 35 Cruise | Express 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 35.0 ft10.67 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 4.7 ft1.42 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Sail area | 546 ft²50.7 m² | 656 ft²60.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.36 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.0 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Cal 35 Cruise vs Express 35: the short version
- The Cal 35 Cruise and Express 35 are close in length (35.1 ft10.69 m vs 35.0 ft10.67 m ).
- The Cal 35 Cruise is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 35 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 14.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 35 Cruise scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 35 Cruise rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.