Cal 35 vs Express 35
How do the Cal 35 and Express 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 35 
Express 35 | Cal 35 | Express 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.1 ft10.69 m | 35.0 ft10.67 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 13,000 lb5,897 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 5,200 lb2,359 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Sail area | 602 ft²55.9 m² | 656 ft²60.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.42 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 244 | 211 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.9 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 2.04 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Cal 35 vs Express 35: the short version
- The Cal 35 and Express 35 are close in length (35.1 ft10.69 m vs 35.0 ft10.67 m ).
- The Cal 35 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Express 35 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 35 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.