Cal 39 Mark II vs Freedom 39 PH
How do the Cal 39 Mark II and Freedom 39 PH compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 39 Mark II | Cal 39 Mark II | Freedom 39 PH | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 32.1 ft9.78 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 17,000 lb7,711 kg | 18,500 lb8,391 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Sail area | 719 ft²66.8 m² | 744 ft²69.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.40 | 17.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 230 | 277 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.1 | 28.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.5 |
Cal 39 Mark II vs Freedom 39 PH: the short version
- The Cal 39 Mark II and Freedom 39 PH are close in length (39.0 ft11.89 m vs 39.0 ft11.89 m ).
- The Freedom 39 PH is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 39 Mark II carries the more powerful rig (17.4 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Freedom 39 PH scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 39 Mark II rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 1.94).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.