Cal 39 Mark II vs Marlow-Hunter 37
How do the Cal 39 Mark II and Marlow-Hunter 37 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 39 Mark II | Cal 39 Mark II | Marlow-Hunter 37 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 39.1 ft11.91 m |
| Waterline length | 32.1 ft9.78 m | 35.7 ft10.87 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 13.1 ft3.99 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.03 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 17,000 lb7,711 kg | 18,995 lb8,616 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 5,727 lb2,598 kg |
| Sail area | 719 ft²66.8 m² | 856 ft²79.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.40 | 19.24 |
| Displacement / Length | 230 | 187 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.1 | 26.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.87 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 8.0 |
Cal 39 Mark II vs Marlow-Hunter 37: the short version
- The Cal 39 Mark II and Marlow-Hunter 37 are close in length (39.0 ft11.89 m vs 39.1 ft11.91 m ).
- The Marlow-Hunter 37 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 37 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 39 Mark II scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 39 Mark II rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 1.96).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.