Cal 39 vs Santana 39
How do the Cal 39 and Santana 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal 39 | Cal 39 | Santana 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 31.7 ft9.65 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 12.6 ft3.83 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 17,500 lb7,938 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Sail area | 750 ft²69.7 m² | 686 ft²63.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.80 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 246 | 245 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.4 | 30.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.94 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.6 |
Cal 39 vs Santana 39: the short version
- The Cal 39 and Santana 39 are close in length (39.0 ft11.89 m vs 39.0 ft11.89 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Cal 39 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 39 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.94).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.