Cal T/4 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24
How do the Cal T/4 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal T/4 | Cal T/4 | Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.2 ft7.37 m | 24.1 ft7.35 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 19.9 ft6.05 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 4,079 lb1,850 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 256 ft²23.8 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.25 | 18.86 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 233 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 20.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €2,970 |
Cal T/4 vs Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24: the short version
- The Cal T/4 and Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 are close in length (24.2 ft7.37 m vs 24.1 ft7.35 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 carries the more powerful rig (18.9 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Misil II / Hallberg Rassy 24 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.