Cal T/4 vs Raven
How do the Cal T/4 and Raven compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cal T/4 | Cal T/4 | Raven | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.2 ft7.37 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 21.6 ft6.58 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 4,000 lb1,814 kg | 1,170 lb531 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 256 ft²23.8 m² | 300 ft²27.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.25 | 43.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 52 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.6 | 6.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
Cal T/4 vs Raven: the short version
- The Cal T/4 and Raven are close in length (24.2 ft7.37 m vs 24.3 ft7.39 m ).
- The Cal T/4 is heavier, displacing about 242% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Raven carries the more powerful rig (43.2 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal T/4 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal T/4 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.