Caliber 40 vs Hallberg-Rassy 40
How do the Caliber 40 and Hallberg-Rassy 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Caliber 40 | Caliber 40 | Hallberg-Rassy 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.9 ft12.47 m | 40.7 ft12.40 m |
| Waterline length | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 36.2 ft11.04 m |
| Beam | 12.7 ft3.86 m | 12.5 ft3.82 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 6.5 ft1.99 m |
| Displacement | 21,600 lb9,798 kg | 22,100 lb10,024 kg |
| Ballast | 9,500 lb4,309 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 739 ft²68.7 m² | 869 ft²80.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.25 | 17.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 281 | 207 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.4 | 31.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.82 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 8.1 |
Caliber 40 vs Hallberg-Rassy 40: the short version
- The Caliber 40 and Hallberg-Rassy 40 are close in length (40.9 ft12.47 m vs 40.7 ft12.40 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hallberg-Rassy 40 carries the more powerful rig (17.7 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Caliber 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hallberg-Rassy 40 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.82).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.