Caliber 40 vs Irwin 41 Citation
How do the Caliber 40 and Irwin 41 Citation compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Caliber 40 | Caliber 40 | Irwin 41 Citation | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.9 ft12.47 m | 40.8 ft12.43 m |
| Waterline length | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 33.3 ft10.14 m |
| Beam | 12.7 ft3.86 m | 13.0 ft3.97 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Displacement | 21,600 lb9,798 kg | 17,500 lb7,938 kg |
| Ballast | 9,500 lb4,309 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Sail area | 739 ft²68.7 m² | 787 ft²73.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.25 | 18.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 281 | 212 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.4 | 24.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.82 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.7 |
Caliber 40 vs Irwin 41 Citation: the short version
- The Caliber 40 and Irwin 41 Citation are close in length (40.9 ft12.47 m vs 40.8 ft12.43 m ).
- The Caliber 40 is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Irwin 41 Citation carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Caliber 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Caliber 40 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.