Caliber 40 vs Swan 48 Frers
How do the Caliber 40 and Swan 48 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Caliber 40 
Swan 48 Frers | Caliber 40 | Swan 48 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.9 ft12.47 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 32.5 ft9.91 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Beam | 12.7 ft3.86 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 21,600 lb9,798 kg | 31,526 lb14,300 kg |
| Ballast | 9,500 lb4,309 kg | 12,100 lb5,488 kg |
| Sail area | 739 ft²68.7 m² | 1,142 ft²106.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.25 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 281 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.4 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.82 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 8.6 |
Caliber 40 vs Swan 48 Frers: the short version
- The Caliber 40 and Swan 48 Frers are close in length (40.9 ft12.47 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- The Swan 48 Frers is heavier, displacing about 46% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 48 Frers carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 48 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 48 Frers rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 1.82).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.