C&C 25 vs C&C 25
How do the C&C 25 and C&C 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 25 
C&C 25 | C&C 25 | C&C 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.2 ft7.68 m | 25.2 ft7.67 m |
| Waterline length | 20.5 ft6.25 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.6 ft2.62 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 4,189 lb1,900 kg | 4,300 lb1,950 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 344 ft²32.0 m² | 306 ft²28.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.18 | 18.52 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.4 | 17.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
C&C 25 vs C&C 25: the short version
- The C&C 25 and C&C 25 are close in length (25.2 ft7.68 m vs 25.2 ft7.67 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.2 vs 18.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.