C&C 25 vs Kirby 25
How do the C&C 25 and Kirby 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 25 
Kirby 25 | C&C 25 | Kirby 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.2 ft7.68 m | 25.2 ft7.67 m |
| Waterline length | 20.5 ft6.25 m | 20.8 ft6.32 m |
| Beam | 8.8 ft2.67 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.17 m | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 4,189 lb1,900 kg | 3,150 lb1,429 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,150 lb522 kg |
| Sail area | 344 ft²32.0 m² | 289 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.18 | 21.52 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 157 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.4 | 12.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.39 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €5,000 | — |
C&C 25 vs Kirby 25: the short version
- The C&C 25 and Kirby 25 are close in length (25.2 ft7.68 m vs 25.2 ft7.67 m ).
- The C&C 25 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Kirby 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 21.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 25 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.39).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.